Table of Contents | ||
---|---|---|
|
Notice
This guide assumes you have read and setup your environments as per the Using Slurm and Spack documentation.
Resource Requests
Slurm provides several different options of allocating CPU's/threads. Below are some scenarios and the appropriate allocations.
CPU request scenarios
- Single-threaded process requires 1 thread on any node: --ntasks=1 --cpus=per-task=1
- Multi-threaded process requires 16 threads on any node: --ntasks=1 --cpus-per-task=16
- Multi-threaded process requires 16 threads on a node with exclusivity (use only if undoubtedly needed): --ntasks=1 --cpus-per-task=16 --exclusive
Warning |
---|
Unless using MPI or slurm "job steps", ntasks should remain = 1 and --nodes should either not be used or be = 1. The "--cpus-per-task" option should be used for thread allocations. For resource allocations with MPI, see: MPI with Slurm. |
Memory request scenarios
- If you have run the program before on SCU resources you can view the job's memory statistics. From there, you can view the job's Maximum used memory and request a small amount over it for your next iteration of the job. See: Requesting appropriate amounts of resources
- If you have never run the program before; refer to the program's documentation for recommended memory requirements. If none exist, start with 8GB and increase if necessary.
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Requesting appropriate amounts of resources
Slurm allocates resources based on the listed hardware requirements in your srun command or sbatch script. It is imperative that users neither exaggerate nor underestimate their resource requirements. Slurm provides tools and resources to help users understand their jobs' resource requirements. See Consequences of requesting inappropriate resources.
Memory
RAM is the SCU's most consumed resource. Therefor, the SCU recommends that your jobs request memory no more than 4GB or 20% greater than your previous jobs' maximum used memory (whichever is higher). This command can be used to query your completed jobs' memory allocation vs their maximum memory use in the past 7 days (modify date field as desired):
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
sacct -S $(date -d "-7 days" +%D) --state=CD -o "user,JobID,JobName,ReqMem,MaxRSS,state,exit" |
eg. If the maximum memory used by the previous iteration of your job was 12GB, you should request a maximum of 16GB of RAM (12GB + 4GB > 12GB x 1.2). To query currently running jobs, use sstat.
Compute
For non-parallelizable or non-multithreading programs, it is best to keep the thread count (--cpus-per-task) to 1. See: Amdahl's Law.
For parallelizable or multithread-supporting programs, many provide options that allow for the specification of the amount of threads to utilize. If the option exists, specify the same amount of threads in your srun or sbatch script that you'll have listed in your program command.
- For programs that do not provide this capability out of the box or require the addition of code, provide a fair estimation of the amount of threads needed (it is best to specify threads to powers of 2). If you cannot provide a fair estimation of needed compute, you can either run the program in an srun interactive session while monitoring compute usage, or view the CPU usages of your program after it's completion.
- If a program by default uses all threads on a machine, you can allocate any number of threads in your srun or sbatch script. Slurm isolates the threads of each job, so your program would be limited to the amount of threads you list in your sbatch script.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
sacct -S $(date -d "-7 days" +%D) --state=CD -o "user,JobID,JobName,cputime,avecpu,ncpus,state,exit" |
In the output of the above command, if cputime (column 4) is orders of magnitude greater than avecpu (column 5), then there were allocated CPU's idle and you should decrease your CPU allocation accordingly. Column 6 is the amount of threads that was requested.
eg. This single-threaded program was run with 16 slurm-allocated threads. The CPUtime was ~11 minutes while the AveCPU was 28 seconds. This is an example of an overallocation of CPU threads
Code Block |
---|
rahmed 511232 sbatch 00:10:56 16 COMPLETED 0:0 511232.batch batch 00:10:56 00:00:28 16 COMPLETED 0:0 |
When allocated with 1 thread rather than 16, the CPUtime decreased to 41 seconds, while the AveCPU remained the same at 28 seconds.
Code Block |
---|
rahmed 511211 sbatch 00:00:41 1 COMPLETED 0:0 511211.batch batch 00:00:41 00:00:28 1 COMPLETED 0:0 |
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Consequences of requesting inappropriate resources
Slurm allocates and isolates your requested resources. Therefor, if resources are either overestimated, or underestimated, it could detriment the timeliness of your workflows and others'.
- Unused resources are resources that could have been used to run other jobs, including yours. If your job requests 100GB of RAM but only uses 12GB, the unused 88GB will have been made unavailable to all other jobs in the queue; slowing down the cluster's churn rate, and causing your jobs and others' to lag behind.
- Unused resources are counted towards your FairShare allocation, lowering your priority for your future jobs. See FairShare.
- Underestimated resources may cause slurm to kill your jobs. So it is important to neither underestimate nor greatly overestimate the resources needed. Slurm will only kill jobs that exceed their memory requests. Threads are individually allocated and isolated so your jobs cannot exceed their allocated thread count.
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
MPI with Slurm
When utilizing MPI, resource requests in Slurm should be allocated differently. Slurm works well with MPI and other parallel environments and as such, srun can be called directly to run mpi programs (see sample script below).
Note: Code and programs must be compiled with explicit support for MPI to utilize MPI capabilities. Also, this does not apply to relion MPI calculations. For SCU documentation on Relion, see: Relion
CPU request scenarios - MPI
- 8 MPI processes that are unconcerned with node placement: --ntasks=8
- 8 MPI processes to be split amongst 4 nodes: --ntasks=8 --ntasks-per-node=2 OR --ntasks=8 --nodes=4 (Both options are functionally identical)
- 8 MPI processes to be split amongst 8 nodes: --ntasks=8 --ntasks-per-node=1 OR --ntasks=8 --nodes=8
- 8 MPI processes to be split amongst 4 nodes with 2 allocated threads per process: --ntasks=8 --ntasks-per-node=2 --cpus=per-task=2. (Total allocated threads would be equal to 16, with each node reserving 4 threads split amongst 2 tasks)
Sample MPI script
In the below script, we will be requesting 8 tasks to be split amongst 4 nodes. Script assumes you have setup both your Spack and Slurm environments.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
#SBATCH --job-name=mpi_expl #SBATCH --ntasks=8 #SBATCH --nodes=4 #SBATCH --mem=64G #SBATCH --output=mpi1.out #SBATCH --partition=panda InputData=/athena/mpi/data OutputData=/athena/mpi/outputData spack load openmpi@3.0.0 schedulers=slurm ~cuda #Copy data to TMPDIR if program is read or write intensive rsync -a $InputData $TMPDIR #slurm integrates well with mpi, so srun can handle the allocation of tasks, threads, nodes, and the calling of mpirun. srun mpi_prog #Copy data back to athena rsync -a $TMPDIR $OutputData |
Job monitoring
In addition to the methods found in the Using Slurm documentation, there are other commands which can be used to query job status, history, accounting data, etc
Status
In the Using Slurm documentation, the commands squeue -u <user> as well as squeue_long -u <user> are shared and explained. In addition to these there are several other commands slurm supports.
To view details of a job submission, this command can be used: scontrol show jobid #job_id
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
scontrol show jobid 595278 JobId=595278 JobName=sbatch UserId=rahmed(8992) GroupId=pbtech(1053) MCS_label=N/A Priority=4140804828 Nice=0 Account=scu QOS=normal JobState=RUNNING Reason=None Dependency=(null) Requeue=1 Restarts=0 BatchFlag=1 Reboot=0 ExitCode=0:0 RunTime=00:00:09 TimeLimit=7-00:00:00 TimeMin=N/A SubmitTime=2019-05-16T17:05:07 EligibleTime=2019-05-16T17:05:07 StartTime=2019-05-16T17:05:08 EndTime=2019-05-23T17:05:08 Deadline=N/A PreemptTime=None SuspendTime=None SecsPreSuspend=0 Partition=panda AllocNode:Sid=curie:11574 ReqNodeList=(null) ExcNodeList=(null) NodeList=node140 BatchHost=node140 NumNodes=1 NumCPUs=1 NumTasks=1 CPUs/Task=1 ReqB:S:C:T=0:0:*:* TRES=cpu=1,mem=1000M,node=1 Socks/Node=* NtasksPerN:B:S:C=0:0:*:* CoreSpec=* MinCPUsNode=1 MinMemoryNode=1000M MinTmpDiskNode=0 Features=(null) DelayBoot=00:00:00 Gres=(null) Reservation=(null) OverSubscribe=OK Contiguous=0 Licenses=(null) Network=(null) Command=/pbtech_mounts/homes024/rahmed/sbatch WorkDir=/pbtech_mounts/homes024/rahmed StdErr=/pbtech_mounts/homes024/rahmed/slurm-595278.out StdIn=/dev/null StdOut=/pbtech_mounts/homes024/rahmed/slurm-595278.out Power= |
The above command displays several useful entries. Including the node, resource configurations that slurm understood from the sbatch scripts, path to the sbatch script, stdout, etc.
History
To view statistics for your previously running jobs, sacct should be used. Modify the # of days as desired. The following command displays all jobs run over the past week
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
sacct -S $(date -d "-7 days" +%D) -o "user,JobID,JobName,ReqMem,MaxRSS,NCPUS,start,end,node,state,exit" |
To view jobs between certain dates (more options are available for sacct. run "man sacct".):
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
sacct -S 04/01/19 -E 04/31/19 -o "user,JobID,JobName,ReqMem,MaxRSS,NCPUS,start,end,node,state,exit" |
For CPU and Memory statistics, see Requesting appropriate amounts of resources
FairShare
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Slurm's "FairShare" algorithm regulates cluster scheduling and prioritization to ensure each lab is able to utilize cluster resources fairly and equitably. The two main factors considered in slurm's calculation of a lab's fairshare is the lab's cluster usage and its amount of priority shares.
Priority shares
A large factor in Slurm's FairShare calculation is a lab's amount of priority shares. Slurm uses priority shares to identify labs' expected share of compute on the cluster. A lab's amount of priority shares is equal to their total amount of leased Athena storage x 100. (10T of scratch + 10T of store = 2000 priority shares). This amount of priority shares would be divided by the total amount of priority shares, the result being the lab's expected share of the cluster. Slurm would then prioritize that lab's jobs to use their compute shares until their share of the cluster has been used.
eg. A lab has procured 50T of storage on athena, which translates to 5000 priority shares. As of when this document was written, slurm would grant this lab priority up to its allocated ~3% of the cluster's use. The lab's jobs would be prioritized at first, but would be deprioritized as jobs run until it has consumed its allocated 3 percent effective usage.
Cluster usage
Cluster usage inversely impacts your fairshare and thus your job priority. As your usage increases, your fairshare and priority decrease. Slurm tracks cluster usage based on the requested Trackable Resources (TRES). TRES currently records requested CPU and RAM allocations, and multiplies that by the runtime of the job. The product being the job's resource allocation, which gets applied towards their allocated percent of cluster use.
Anchor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
FairShare score
Fairshare is the resulting score after Slurm calculates the aforementioned factors. Fairshare scores are the deciding factor when it comes to job prioritization and are represented from 0 to 1. 1 being the highest priority and 0 being the lowest. Below are fairshare scores and their implications.
- A fairshare score of 1: This lab has not run any jobs. It's jobs will be prioritized over all others.
- A fairshare score 0.5 < n < 1: This lab has not utilized it's expected share of cluster usage. It's jobs will also be prioritized over all jobs with a lower fairshare.
- A fairshare score 0.0 < n < 0.5: This lab has overutilized the cluster according to it's expected share of cluster usage. It's jobs will be deprioritized
- A fairshare score of 0: This lab has greatly overutilized their share of the cluster. Its jobs will be deprioritized and will run only when all other prioritized jobs have begun to run.
FairShare query
The sshare command can be run from curie or any slurm node to display fairshare statistics for all labs.
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
sshare Account User RawShares NormShares RawUsage EffectvUsage FairShare root 1.000000 694362950 1.000000 0.500000 abc 2000 0.011481 28 0.000000 0.999998 accardi_lab 3000 0.017221 45166247 0.065072 0.072870 aksaylab 100 0.000574 0 0.000000 1.000000 angsd_class 300 0.001722 19770 0.000028 0.988597 ... |
In the output, we see the two factors that are considered in fairshare calculation, cluster usage and priority shares.
Going column by column, we can the the values of a lab's usage and shares and how slurm takes that into account when calculating fairshare.
- Account: Name of lab in Slurm's database.
- User: When using sshare -a, slurm displays the fairshare calculation for all users in all labs. This can be used for more thorough accounting.
- RawShares: The amount of shares a lab has been allotted. This is reached by calculating total athena storage * 100 = RawShares
- NormShares: This is the percentage of a lab's RawShares to the total shares for the entire cluster. This number is used by slurm to allocate n percentage of cluster usage to said lab.
- RawUsage: The amount of compute usage a lab has run or has requested in their jobs. sshare -l will display a column which lists exact CPU and RAM usages.
- EffectvUsage: The percentage of actual cluster use by the lab. This is compared with the lab's NormShares to determine the lab's FairShare score in the next column. If EffectvUsage is greater than the lab's NormShares, the fairshare will always be < 0.5. The reverse is also true. See FairShare Score
- FairShare: The lab's resulting FairShare score. See FairShare Score.
Halflife
Slurm FairShare calculations have a halflife of 7 days. So if a lab exhausts its allocated usage and its resulting FairShare is = 0, it's FairShare should reset to 0.5 if 7 days pass with no usage.